Tuesday, 26 March 2024

The Guardian CSP

 The Guardian newspaper and website analysis


Use your own purchased copy plus the notable front pages above to answer the following questions - bullet points/note form is fine. 

1) What are the most significant front page headlines seen in the Guardian in recent years?

  • Stories about putting pressure on the government
  • Israel and Palestine war
  • A lot of US politics

2) Ideology and audience: What ideologies are present in the Guardian? Is the audience positioned to respond to stories in a certain way?

The ideologies present are left-wing, liberal and progressive. The audience is positioned to show that there is a divide showing how there are poor people and how we should help them. It talks proudly of the labour party and other left parties telling the audiences to vote left to make the country great whilst constructing the Conservative party as enemies. It also glamorises the NHS suggesting how tax should be increased for their benefit.

3) How do the Guardian editions/stories you have studied reflect British culture and society?

A lot of the stories are to do with the British politics and the left vs right debate between the Labour and Conservatives. There are many stories to do with the NHS which looks like they are idolising them. There are also sports stories which focus on the England Rugby team and the Premier League, something the the British people are proud of.

Now visit the Guardian newspaper website and look at a few stories before answering these questions:

1) What are the top stories? Are they examples of soft news or hard news? 

The top story is about the terrorist attack at the Moscow concert. This is an example of hard news as it is to do with terrorism which is like war and involves elite nations and people.

2) To what extent do the stories you have found on the website reflect the values and ideologies of the Guardian?

The values and ideologies is left-wing, liberal and progressive. Having stories about the Ukraine and Russia war and focusing on Ukraine would be liberal, and focusing on women's sports would also bee seen as progressive.

3) Think about audience appeal and gratifications: what would an audience enjoy about the Guardian newspaper website?

A lot of the stories are to do with the Ukraine and Russia war, economics politics which would appeal to the Guardian readers as they are higher class, AB audiences which enjoy reading these type of stories 

The Guardian newspaper Factsheet

Read Media Factsheet #257 The Guardian Newspaper. You can access it from our Media Factsheet archive on the Media Shared drive or download it here via Google using your school login details. Answer the following questions:

1) Who owns the Guardian and what is their ownership designed to achieve? 

Owned by The Guardian Media Group (GMG) which is a global media group whose parent company is the Scott Trust Limited. They are designed to achieve "to secure the financial and editorial independence of The Guardian" and "safeguard the journalistic freedom and liberal values" of the paper from "commercial or political interference".  

2) How is the Guardian regulated? Note its very unusual regulatory approach and give examples where you can. 

They teamed up with the
financial times to form their own regulatory board, and not regulated by IPSO. They have an external auditor which makes sure they don't tell lies or make fabrications. They have been scrutiny when covering the Israel-Palestine. 

3) Pick out some key statistics on the Guardian's audience (see beginning of page 2).

Demographic:
  • 86% ABC1
  • 54% male
  • Average age 54

  • Circulation: 3.2 million daily
  • Digital readership: 18.4 million
  • 3rd individual newspaper website in the world
  • 62 million unique browsers worldwide every month - 2/3rds coming from outside of UK
4) What are the institutional values of the Guardian? What does it stand for?   

Have a critical friend relationship with political parties which are centre-left, as the Guardian have centre-left values. They provide a more oppositional view to right-wing newspapers like The Daily Mail, The Telegraph, and The Times.

5) How is the Guardian's international audience described? See the end of page 2 and pick out some more useful statistics here about their audience .

  • 79% male
  • 89% degree level educated+ 
  • 66% daily visitors on website
  • More than 1/4 earn 58k euros/$100k

6) Now look at page 3 of the factsheet and the Guardian online. Select a few examples of the different sections of the website and copy them here. 

  • Headlines
  • Culture
  • Climate Crisis
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Video

7) What different international editions of the Guardian's website are available and what example stories are provided as examples of this?

  • UK edition - April 29th - story to do with BBC chairman resigning who provided a secret £800,000 to PM Boris Johnson - hard news as BBC is meant to remain impartial. BBC free model directly competes with The Guardian.
  • US edition - April 29th - story on Florida lawyer who imprisoned suspected terrorists. The article had researchers which created bias and didn't accuse him directly of anything. Article was positioned as centre-right.

8) What is the Guardian's funding model? Do you think it is sustainable? 

Funded through several ways:
  • Through sale of print newspaper even though it is declining.
  • Digital subscriptions.
  • Patron support with exclusive offers.
  • Traditional advertising.
  • Philanthropic partnerships such as with The Bill & Melinda Gates foundation.
I think all of these are sustainable (apart from selling print as this is declining) as this attracts the audiences to buy and spend their money on those products and bring hybrids.

9) What is the Cotton Capital Commission and how does it link to the Guardian's values and ideologies?

Investigative journalism, coupled with what amounts to a historical autobiography of the newspaper. Utilises a range of literary techniques to tell the story of the newspapers past. As the Guardian is left-wing, liberal and progressive, so by talking about the past of the newspapers stating their apology for their involvement in the slave trade, it shows how they accepted their mistake and what to move on.

10) What audience and industry theories could be applied to the Guardian? How? 

Blumler and Katz: Uses and Gratifications theory

  • Provides surveillance as it gives out news.
  • Some groups may be able to have personal identity with some of the stories.
  • Personal relationships can be built with some of the subjects in the story.
  • Diversion
The Guardian encourages its audience to be active with the newspaper, making them get involved in news-making.

Pleasures by seeing the values you may side with being reflected in the newspaper. However this could have negative side effects as it creates echo chambers. But audiences are free to oppose or accept these ideas.

Daily engagement with the newspaper could enhance the readers cultural capital (Bourdie).

Things like investigate journalism, Curran and Seaton agree with as they believe that it is an important civic duty as it challenges power. 


Media Magazine articles


MM78 - The Guardian

1) What are the Pandora Papers and how does the story fit with the Guardian's ethos, values and ideologies?  

Where secrets are released about the evil things in the world. This allowed The Guardian to be positioned as a serious news organisation, speaking the truth to the global world.

2) Pick out all the key statistics and quotes from the section on the Guardian's funding model. In particular, the fall in paper readership, the rise in digital readership and the number of contributors  paying to support the journalism. 

  • July 2021 sales averaged 105,135 copies per day (down from 248,775 in 2010).
  • 3.5 million readers per day online and 129 million monthly visits.
  • From 1 million readers: 401,100 took digital subscriptions in 2020/21 and 506,00 made a recurring payment, 508,000 made one-off payments.

3) What does it mean when it says the Guardian frames regular payments from readers as a "philanthropic act". 

That the people who pay are paying to make the press freely available for those who cannot pay for it.

4) What is the Scott Trust and do you think it is a sustainable model for newspaper ownership in the future? 

The Scott Trust is a trust which operates for profit but all the money get back into the newspapers, and ensures that the editorial interests remain free from commercial pressure. I think it is a sustainable model for the future as it allows them to have a huge lump of money to fall back on if they go into financial problems.

5) Why is the Guardian criticised as hypocritical? Give some specific examples here.

They talk in their newspapers about how the capitalist ideologies are wrong but yet are backed by the Scott Trust and GMG which have a fund of £1 billion. 

MM87 - The Daily Mail and the Guardian front page analysis

1) What are the stories featured on the Guardian and Daily Mail on November 10, 2023? 

They are about Rishi Sunak in the process if he is going to be sacking Suella Braverman for her outspokenness on the Pro-Palestine marchers. 

2) How do they reflect the values and ideologies of the two newspapers?

The Guardian is more left-wing liberal so talks about the Conservative government in a more negative light, suggesting that they are under "pressure" over a "clash". However, The Mail is much more capitalist and pro-conservative and it suggests how Rishi Sunak is doing what he can to bring justice, he is "in talks with his closest advisors", but still sides with the right-wing view as the masthead is "You come for Suella, you come for us all" suggesting how they are a united party and how they side with her.

3) Why does the writer suggest the front-page images on both papers might be exploitative? Do you agree? 

The Guardian is said to be exploiting gender stereotypes, which is the very thing they shouldn't be doing as the pictures depicts a female in distress (Props character types - princess in distress) even though people of all ages and sexes are being kidnapped. However it could also be shown as female empowerment. The Mail however did not have an image of the protests but instead of a female victim of murder. The writer suggests that at least The Mail were honest about using a female victim rather than hiding it like The Guardian did. 

4) What else does the writer suggest regarding the Daily Mail's front-page image of murdered teacher Ashling Murphy? 

He suggests if it is any different to that if a victim of kidnapping. It feeds into a voyeuristic interest in female victimhood giving a warning to females of the dangers.

5) How does the rest of the Guardian's front page (features on Yoko Ono and Todd Haynes) reflect the values and ideologies of Guardian readers?    

They reflect the ideologies progressiveness, left-wing and libertarianism as they were involved in anti-war protests and Haynes made films exploring gender identity, particularly female identity.

A/A* extension tasks

Look at the Guardian Media Kit in more detail. What do you notice about the Guardian's audience compared to other newspaper brands? What is a 'typical Guardian reader'? 

The Guardian's audiences mainly access the guardian through online digital copies and are also very heavy on cross-platform viewing. A typical guardian reader is a male who is 35+ in a class AB, earning more than £30k, from southeast London who shops regularly. 

Take on the tasks at the end of the Guardian factsheet, including the exam question: “Media audiences do not simply consume media content anymore.” Focusing on the newspapers you have studied, to
what extent do you agree with this statement?

I agree with this statement to a certain extent as they still do consume it, but in different and non-traditional methods.

The readership of The Guardian is 26.7 million in the UK, 23.6 of them are digital users. So we can tell from this that that audience are still consuming media, but majority of them are consuming it in more newer ways. As the media is becoming more digitally convergent, audiences consume media this way as it is much more accessible and also can be cheaper. Jenkins suggests that convergence "involves both a change in the way the media is produced and a way the media is consumed". Therefore audiences don't consume it in its traditional way so newspaper is not consumed as it used to, instead, this news cooperation have used alternative methods by shifting towards online producing.

Audiences are not consuming newspapers as they were compared to 10 years ago. In the early 2000's, The Daily Mail's readership was 2 million. This overtime has decreased to 1.2 million. This is due to the rise of the digital age and social media. Audiences can now get their news for free on social platform like X or from places like the BBC. This has raised concerns in the past with other newspapers complaining, e.g. Rupert Murdoch complained about how he couldn't sell his newspapers as BBC was competing with free news, and he saw this as unfair. This cause competition for Newspapers, so they have to move with the times. Hesmondhalgh suggests that "the media is a risky business" therefore as social and cultural habits shift, so do the cultural industry to provide for those new audiences.

In conclusion, I partially agree with the statement made as audiences habits haven't stopped them from consuming media, but changing the way they consume it.

Tuesday, 19 March 2024

Daily Mail and Mail Online

 Daily Mail and Mail Online analysis 


Use your own purchased copy or our scanned copy of the Brexit edition from January 2020 plus the notable front pages above to answer the following questions - bullet points/note form is fine.

1) What are the most significant front page headlines seen in the Daily Mail in recent years?

Brexit headline, Party gate, Lock down announcement.

2) Ideology and audience: What ideologies are present in the Daily Mail? Is the audience positioned to respond to stories in a certain way?

The audience are positioned to be in a patriotic way, siding with the nation however are not put in a position to vote conservative.

3) How do the Daily Mail stories you have studied reflect British culture and society?

They reflect the ideologies of British culture through the news stories about the British government, the NHS and the news stories about British celebrities and shows like Eastender's and Strictly Come Dancing.

Now visit Mail Online and look at a few stories before answering these questions:

1) What are the top five stories? Are they examples of soft news or hard news? Are there any examples of ‘clickbait’ can you find?

  1. Horrifying moment motorcyclist in his 40s is catapulted into the air off a bridge by 'road rage' BMW driver, 34, who rammed him after pair swapped 'non-verbal exchange', leaving rider seriously injured - as motorist is jailed for nearly five years | Daily Mail Online - soft news
  2. 'King Charles is NOT dead': British embassy in Moscow issues furious denial after Russian media shared fake Buckingham Palace statement claiming Monarch 'passed away unexpectedly yesterday afternoon' | Daily Mail Online - hard news
  3. NADINE DORRIES: The moment I saw an aborted foetus gasping for breath scarred me for life. Extending 'pills by post' abortion right up to birth would be a terrible mistake | Daily Mail Online -soft news
  4. Countries where antidepressants are most commonly prescribed around the world REVEALED | Daily Mail Online - soft news
  5. Kate Middleton's surprise farm shop trip piles more pressure on the Palace to update the nation on her recovery because aides' silence is just fuelling more conspiracy theories, warn experts | Daily Mail Online - hard news

2) To what extent do the stories you have found on MailOnline reflect the values and ideologies of the Daily Mail newspaper?

Some of the stories are right wing such as the royal family report of Kate Middelton and King Charles however the rest are general/human interest news reports which don't really fit the right wing category.

3) Think about audience appeal and gratifications: why is MailOnline the most-read English language newspaper website in the world? How does it keep you on the site?

Visual appeals as it is jam-packed with stories on the homepage and side bar, also there are loads of pictures and videos giving a more technological appeal to the website for the audiences. Blumler and Katz: Uses and Gratification - provides surveillance and diversion. Also personal relationships as audience bond with the subjects in the report e.g. women with Kate Middelton and personal identity through having a similar lifestyle or background as reported in the report e.g. black people with BLM stories. Keeps you reading as, as soon as you finish one story, it gives other similar suggestions to read too.

Factsheet 175 - Case Study: The Daily Mail (Part 1)

1) What news content generally features in the Daily Mail?

Generally has a combination of serious journalism and entertainment. 

2) What is the Daily Mail’s mode of address? 

A method of creating a relationship between the addresser (producer) and the addressee (audience)

3) What techniques of persuasion does the Daily Mail use to attract and retain readers?

They establish a consensus in line with the political and social ideologies, which then stirs emotion up in the consumer. This gets split into 3 categories: Practical - which includes bribery e.g. coupons, improving the newspaper. Emotional - which includes hyperbole, repetition and giving a comforting or fear feeling. Association - which includes celebrity endorsement and evidence from experts.

4) What is the Daily Mail’s editorial stance?

In a YouGov pol,
 81% consider The Daily Mail to be right wing, with 44% suggesting it to be "very right wing". Traditionally, The Daily Mail is considered to be supporting the Conservative party and known to be criticising the Labour party and the then Leader Jeremy Corbyn, with even them telling some readers in certain constituents to vote for UKIP as they were in competition with Labour. The paper also often criticise BBC due to its left-wing bias. 

5) Read this brilliant YouGov article on British newspapers and their political stance. Where does the Daily Mail fit in the overall picture of UK newspapers? 

  • 81% consider The Daily Mail to be right wing, with 44% suggesting it to be "very right wing".
  • Seen as Britain's most right wing newspaper.
  • A strong number of people think that the Daily Mail has a very right perceived ideology, yet have a personal belief that it is very left.

Factsheet 177 - Case Study: The Daily Mail (Part 2)

Now read Media Factsheet 177: Case Study: The Daily Mail (Part 2) and complete the following questions/tasks. Our Media Factsheet archive is on the Media Shared drive: M:\Resources\A Level\Media Factsheets or online here (you'll need your Greenford Google login).

1) How did the launch of the Daily Mail change the UK newspaper industry?

There were technological developments which meant that the Daily Mail could increase their volume of sales and offer the newspapers at affordable prices. The columns were smaller and advertisers took a lot of the room which gave a new layout for newspapers, the inverted pyramid - the lead story which has the most critical information having the most room, then the helpful but not critical information so facts and details which had some room and then followed by nice, but not essential which the least important information and the least room. Telegrams were used for effective communication, increasing popularity with the audiences.

2) What company owns the Daily Mail? What other newspapers, websites and brands do they own?

Owned by the Daily Mail and General Trust plc (DMGT) - owns and publishes: Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday, MailOnline, Mail Plus, Metro, Metro.co.uk, Mail Today, Mail Travel, wowcher, Jobsite and This is Money.

3) Between 1992 and 2018 the Daily Mail editor was Paul Dacre. What is Dacre’s ideological position and his view on the BBC?

Dacre's ideological view is more left-wing and liberal as he supported a Labour MP who was also the Foreign secretary, Jack Straw, supported liberal politics, covering student sit-in protests, gay rights and drug use. Dacre does not not support the BBC as he believes that it is a free service providing news and so is taking the market for radio, other news services both nationally and internationally and is also now effecting the newspaper industry and suggests that "Lines must be drawn in the sand." "It destroys media plurality" and "imposes liberal leftish monoculture that is destroying free and open debate in in Britain."

4) Why did Guardian journalist Tim Adams describe Dacre as the most dangerous man in Britain? What example stories does Adams refer to?

He suggests how he covered the immigration story multiple times in one month and also another news story which was about a man who was a violently extreme advocate for the "Britain First" killed his wife. He makes patriots of Britain seem crazy.

5) How does the Daily Mail cover the issue of immigration? What representations are created in this coverage?

Immigrants are made to look destructive and are put in the stereotypical light as they usually are as criminals. The headline reads "EU killers and rapists we've failed to deport." 


Factsheet 182 - Case Study: The Daily Mail (Part 3) Industrial Context


1) What do Curran and Seaton suggest regarding the newspaper industry and society?

That anyone should be able to set up a newspaper and that it should maintain liberal ideology. However newspaper can be used for propaganda and they have become industrialised. Internet has made newspapers more affordable and cheaper.

2) What does the factsheet suggest regarding newspaper ownership and influence over society?

That the more readership newspapers had, they were more
influential for political gain.

3) Why did the Daily Mail invest heavily in developing MailOnline in the 2000s?

They thought that if they invest in more content and
"grow traffic" then it would become a bigger business than the daily mail.

4) How does MailOnline reflect the idea of newspapers ‘as conversation’?

There would be
multiple people voicing there opinion, with it being informative and also having places for entertaining, political and reflecting social identities.

5) How many stories and pictures are published on MailOnline?

1000 stories but around 10,000 pictures.


6) How does original MailOnline editor Martin Clarke explain the success of the website?

He suggests that they
"cover the waterfront" and that they provide you with every type of news story you need. He suggests that he spends time making the homepage engaging and interesting.

7) How is the priority for stories on the homepage established on MailOnline?

That they let the audience choose what they want to read, and the story with the
highest click count makes the homepage/main story.

8) What is your view of ‘clicks’ driving the news agenda? Should we be worried that readers are now ‘in control of digital content’?

No, I don't think we should be worried, as we as audiences should be in control in what we view and read, therefore if it is making a news story more popular then the story is something that most people would want to see.


A/A* extension task

Read this Guardian column if you'd like to go the extra mile on this CSP: So Daily Mail and Mail Online are ‘totally separate’? It depends how you look at it by Peter Preston

To further your understanding of the Daily Mail, read this Guardian column by Media veteran Peter Preston on a row between the Guardian and the Mail over the controversial MailOnline (ex-) columnist Katie Hopkins. You could then answer the following questions if you wish:

1) Why does Preston suggest that the Daily Mail and MailOnline should be considered to be basically the same publication?

As it is part of the same company and pretty much has the same readership, demographic and psychographic and the same/similar news story.

2) How does Preston summarise other newspaper websites?

That the websites and just more
exaggerated and fancier design of the actual newspaper.

3) How many readers does the online-only Independent now boast?

19 million readers.

4) Do you feel the Daily Mail and MailOnline have a different ‘world view’?

No, as they are part of the same company so have the
same beliefs, values and ideologies. 

5) Do you see a future for the paper version of the Daily Mail or will it eventually close like the Independent?

I think that the Daily Mail will still live as a print newspaper as it is the most read and also as having a physical copy of print will become an audience pleasure for a niche market in the future just like the Gentlewoman, as the media is becoming more technologically advanced.

Monday, 11 March 2024

Regulation

 Task One: Media Magazine article and questions


Read the Media Magazine article: From Local Press to National Regulator in MM56 (p55). You'll find the article in our Media Magazine archive here. Once you've read the article, answer the following questions:

1) Keith Perch used to edit the Leicester Mercury. How many staff did it have at its peak and where does Perch see the paper in 10 years' time?


They had 130 employees at its peak. Perch suggests that in ten years: if it is still print, it will be weekly, extremely expensive and have a very small circulation. However, if it is online, it will be unlikely to make money and so would only have 5-6 employees. 

2) How does Perch view the phone hacking scandal?


Perch is against the phone hacking scandal and suggests that "a small section of the press behaved in a totally unacceptable way" and how it "should have been delt with legally",  but doesn't think that regulation is needed.

3) What does IPSO stand for and how does it work?


IPSO - Independent Press Standards Organisation - a newspaper has 28 days to deal with a complaints, and if it has not been resolved then you can take this up with the IPSO Complaints committee which will see if the editors code of practice has been broken. 

4) What is Perch's view of newspaper ownership?


He is not against it as he is saying that whoever has bought or owns the paper has the right to say what they feel like just as anyone else is, and that people have the ability to choose what newspapers they consume.

5) Do you agree with his view that broadcast news should have less regulation so that TV channels can support particular political parties or people?


Yes I agree with this view as, as stated in the article there are many more news broadcasting channels for audiences to pick and choose so they are not exposed to only one political viewpoint and can make there on decision and go elsewhere. 


Task Two: Newspaper regulation exam question


Write an answer on your blog answering the following exam question:


What are the arguments for and against statutory regulation of the newspaper industry? [20 marks]

Aim to write an answer of around 400-500 words featuring at least three detailed paragraphs. Make sure you cover both sides of the debate. This topic could well be our 20-mark essay at the end of Paper 1, Section B so it's great preparation for the summer exams.


In my opinion, I don't think there should be statutory regulation enforced on newspapers. This is where the government decides and pick and chooses what we as an audience are allowed to view and what we aren't. 

I think Investigative journalism is useful in some ways, and by having statutory regulation, this would take the right away from us as audiences and citizens to obtain useful information. For example, investigative journalism has lead us to know of the fact that the British government decided to have a party during the covid lockdown when they shouldn't have, even though they imposed those strict regulations to not have gatherings. Therefore we were able to actually see what the people who rule and dictate our day to day lives actually do, and even people who represent our country. So, if statutory regulation had been involved, this story might have been hidden or covered, or even altered so they didn't look evil in the public eye, meaning that statutory regulation is useless for us.

However, I do believe that sometimes statutory regulation is useful. For example in some cases of investigative journalism have involved digging into people private lives which could ruin the life of that person or others involved in some way. For example, when Matt Hancock cheated on his wife, the news and footage of his affair was leaked showing him kissing another women. In some ways i agree with the fact the news did leak this as again it showed government officials who we are meant to trust and represent out country, breaking rules that they had imposed. But as this was much more of a personal matter, this couldve affected the lives of his wife and his young children who must've seen the clip numerous number of times as it was posted and published everywhere my media cooperation's and the newspaper industry. So in this case, I disagree with it as it is not fair in his family to have to see the footage and news of that as it would detrimentally effect them, so statutory regulation would've been seen as useful for the sake of letting him privately discuss that matter with his family, rather than his family having to suffer by seeing that news story everywhere.

However, I think it is also seen as useless as Statutory regulation takes away the right of "freedom of speech". By having news stories regulated so newspapers are only allowed to say certain things becomes a political dictatorship as everyone with money who is corrupt or allied with the government is protected even though if they have done wrong, which doesn't do justice to the audiences and citizens as it could be some sort of moral or techno panics (Stanley Cohen).

Overall, I disagree with statutory regulation as it is useless and constrictive so doesn't let audience know about certain events and details about people 


Extension task: The role of media in democracies

Read this excellent article from the Constitution Unit on why media plays such an important role in democracies - and how regulation and affect this. Does this change your opinion on whether the newspaper industry should face statutory regulation? 

My opinion is still balanced and central as on one hand, the media and newspapers do help me doing investigative journalism as they can leak out information from the government that they are hiding from us e.g. stories like the lockdown party and the USA Watergate scandal. However, they don't need to dig into celebrities lives and release news about their personal lives e.g. news about them cheating on their spouse, as it could even damage the personal wellbeing of the spouse.

Monday, 4 March 2024

News Values

 1) What example news story does the Factsheet use to illustrate Galtung and Ruge's News Values? Why is it an appropriate example of a news story likely to gain prominent coverage?

A British servicewoman died after a bomb blast in Afghanistan. This is appropriate as proximity of Afghanistan is far away, but as the death is of a British officer, it makes the news story feel much closer. This is seen as newsworthy as it is the first female officer to be killed. The war is ongoing so is seen as continuity. This is seen as not predictable as she was a bomb disposal officer expert so you expect them to survive. Clarity is also shown as it comes from a trustworthy source. 

2) What is gatekeeping?

The process of
filtering out the information, usually done by the editor, and picking some stories over another before publishing them. 

3) What are the six ways bias can be created in news?

Bias through...
  • ...selection and omission
  • ...placement
  • ...headline
  • ...photos, captions and camera angles
  • ...use of names and titles
  • ...choice of words

4) How have online sources such as Twitter, bloggers or Wikileaks changed the way news is selected and published?

These sources have changed the way news agencies gatekeep information as publishers publish information the news would not do, which news cooperates dislike.

5) In your opinion, how has the digital age changed Galtung and Ruge’s news values? 

In my opinion, I don't think the digital age has changed Galtung and Ruge's news values as
whether an audience read from online or offline, the beliefs, values and ideologies they have will have will still be the same.

6) How would you update these news values for the digital age? Choose TWO of Galtung and Ruge's news values and say how they have been affected by the growth of digital technology.

E.g. Immediacy is more important than ever due to news breaking on social media or elsewhere online. However, this in turn changes the approach of other news sources such as newspapers as the news will probably already be broken so different angles might be required. Newspapers now contain more comment or opinion rather than the breaking story.  


  • Intensity or threshold value - with the digital age, when an event or news story occurs, people now days post this up on social media to increase a higher intensity and attract more attention to the news.

  • Clarity or lack of ambiguity - as sometimes there may be confusion when reading a news story, in the digital age it is easier to check if the news story is correct as you can search and view other articles as it is easier to access online.

The Future of Journalism


Part 1: Clay Shirky lecture

 Play the clip AND read along with the transcript below to ensure you are following the argument. You need to watch from the beginning to 29.35 (the end of Shirky's presentation). Once you've watched and read the presentation and made notes (you may want to copy and paste key quotes from the transcript which is absolutely fine), answer the questions below:


1) Why does Clay Shirky argue that 'accountability journalism' is so important and what example does he give of this?

He suggests that it is shrinking and that our society needs it. The example given is of Catholic priests who raped 100 boys and whenever this was questioned in the media, the Catholic church would take him of to rehab.

2) What does Shirky say about the relationship between newspapers and advertisers? Which websites does he mention as having replaced major revenue-generators for newspapers (e.g. jobs, personal ads etc.)?

That in the past,
newspapers had the power over adverts as if a advertisement company didn't like a story published by the newspaper then they couldn't really leave as there was no where as to go. Monster and Match and Craigslist.

3) Shirky talks about the 'unbundling of content'. This means people are reading newspapers in a different way. How does he suggest audiences are consuming news stories in the digital age?

Audience are consuming news stories from social media on
Twitter, Facebook etc. which have been sent to them.

4) Shirky also talks about the power of shareable media. How does he suggest the child abuse scandal with the Catholic Church may have been different if the internet had been widespread in 1992?

That it might have been more widespread if the internet was more accessible, as people would have forwarded the news story and make it have more
publicity but as this wasn't the case, the story eventually died down.

5) Why does Shirky argue against paywalls? 

He suggests that it
stops the spreading of news articles and that audiences would then be less likely to view them and forward them to others. He suggests that by doing this, audience would just start publishing news themselves so it wouldn't work as a business model for the news companies. 

6) What is a 'social good'? In what way might journalism be a 'social good'?

When a group of people get together to do something for themselves.
Journalism can be seen as this as the journalists write news stories such as accountability journalism which they and the public can both benefit from.

7) Shirky says newspapers are in terminal decline. How does he suggest we can replace the important role in society newspapers play? What is the short-term danger to this solution that he describes?

He suggests we need more
accountability journalism which, but it is short-term as it won't completely replace newspapers as it would still hold the same structure and function.

8) Look at the first question and answer regarding institutional power. Give us your own opinion: how important is it that major media brands such as the New York Times or the Guardian continue to stay in business and provide news?

I think it is very important as they are
huge brands which been existing for a long time so have been a part of the culture and tradition from their origin. They have a wide audience and so have a duty to report to them. And due to being big names, they are seen as trustworthy sources.

Part 2: MM55 - Media, Publics, Protest and Power

Media Magazine 55 has an excellent feature on power and the media. Go to our Media Magazine archive, click on MM55 and scroll to page 38 to read the article Media, Publics, Protest and Power', a summary of Media academic Natalie Fenton’s talk to a previous Media Magazine conference. Answer the following questions:

1) What are the three overlapping fields that have an influence on the relationship between media and democracy?
 
Political field, economic field and journalistic field.

2) What is ‘churnalism’ and what issues are there currently in journalism?

Churnalism - the practice of cut and paste.
More news is needed to be published than before but the Newspaper industry doesn't have a suitable business model as it is difficult to "maintain the profit margins". Also, there is a shortage of journalists. 

3) What statistics are provided by Fenton to demonstrate the corporate dominance of a small number of conglomerates? 

3 companies control 71%
of UK national newspaper circulation while only five groups control more than 80% of combined online and offline news.

4) What is the 'climate of fear' that Fenton writes about in terms of politics and the media? 

Politicians fear having negative publicity e.g. The Leveson Enquiry.
Political parties, the police and other institutions are forced to investigate the wrongdoings in the news media. Media has the money to buy large cooperates with a large sum of money with legalisation, so when the government, the public and journalists have the power, then there is little freedom.

5) Fenton finishes her article by discussing pluralism, the internet and power. What is your opinion on this crucial debate - has the internet empowered audiences and encouraged democracy or is power even more concentrated in the hands of a few corporate giants?

The internet has allowed audience to have power as they can now be producers too (prosumers), and big corporate giants rely on audiences to for their fan base so they can monetise from them, as without being able to sell their products to them they cannot make profit. 

Newspaper: Final Index

1) Newspapers: Weekly news stories from Mail Online and The Guardian  2) Newspapers: The decline in print media 3) Newspapers: News Values  ...